For this course activity, you will interview an activist and then present a report that contextualizes the interview with the readings you have done so far. You should ask your interviewee no less than five (5) questions. These could be about what motivated them to participate in it, what they seek to achieve, how involved they are with the movement, some of the challenges they face, their political orientation, etc.

I do not want your report to be in the Q&A format. Rather, integrate their responses in the context of the course material and present a well written report that is at least 500-word long.

ORDER NURSING COURSE WORKS HERE

Topic: Legal challenges in informatics 

In this forum, share the resources you have retrieved and briefly discuss the references you feel are most appropriate for your presentation. 5 References: Identify your topic, briefly summarize 5 scholarly resources on your topic. Be sure to list all references in APA style format.

How to instructions


Return to the topic you chose in the week three. Articulate a specific dilemma in a situation faced by a particular person based on that topic. The situation can be real or fictional.

  • write a summary of the dilemma.
  • Define any needed key terms associated with the dilemma.
  • Analyze the conflicts or controversies involved in the dilemma.

Revise and write based on any feedback you received in your previous draft (week three). 

Reference and discuss any professional code of ethics relevant to your topic such as the AMA code for doctors, the ANA code for nurses, etc.  State whether and how your chosen topic involves any conflicts between professional and familial duties or conflicts between loyalty to self and loyalty to a community or nation.

What in your view is the most moral thing for that person to do in that dilemma? Why is that the most moral thing? Use moral values and logical reasoning to justify your answer

Next, apply the following:

  • Aristotle’s Golden Mean to the dilemma
  • Utilitarianism to the dilemma
  • Natural Law ethics to the dilemma

Which of those three theories works best ethically speaking? Why that one?

Why do the other two not work or not work as well?

 Is it the same as what you said is the most moral thing earlier? Why or why not?

Use the 5 articles from your annotated bibliography to support your answers. Requirements

  • Length: 4-5 pgs not including title page or references page)
  • 1-inch margins
  • Double spaced
  • 12-point Times New Roman font
  • Title page
  • apa format 
  • References page (minimum of 5 scholarly sources)

Introduction
Each person owes a duty to himself or herself and to the world to study ethics and to engage in thoughtful debate about what is right, and what is wrong. It is this habit of thinking about and reflecting on ethics that will help you determine the right choices when faced with an ethical dilemma.

Initial Post Instructions
Articulate a moral dilemma wherein one has to show a specific virtue or virtues (it can be any virtue or virtues including honesty, courage, charity/generosity, compassion, etc.)

  • What is the moral dilemma about?
  • What virtue or virtues should be shown? (You are here selecting the best course of action)
  • Why is that virtue or those virtues to be shown?
  • How should the virtue or virtues be expressed, and why in that manner?
  • Apply Aristotle’s golden mean to the dilemma.
  • Tell us how the dilemma involves conflict moral duties (loyalty to community versus to self, professional versus familial duties, national or personal obligations).

The dilemma must be a situation in which a choice has to be made.

Be sure you told us why your chosen course of action was best.

Writing Requirements

  • Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings/online lessons and an outside scholarly source)
  • APA format for in-text citations and list of references